Business law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Business law - Essay ExampleThe second heavens of grounds for action is the failure of the transit agency, with regards to assigning a staff member, who would oversee the gum elastic measures to be observed while using the buses owned by the society. Further, the roles of the safety director should be clearly stated. From the trip of the Lancung bus, it is apparent that the driver took the responsibility for safety, by refraining the dancing of the passengers at the bus, which was not enough to maintain safety during the duration of travel. The other area that a suit against the company could be based on is the demarcation line of the role of employees, towards accident prevention at the bus. First, it should be noted that the responsibility of accident prevention lies with either personnel, including higher ranking staff like the board of directors to low ranking staffs like drivers. In this area, the company holds the responsibility of hiring qualified personnel, who can aid in the prevention of accidents. The orientation and training of employees should also be carried out, with special regard to accident prevention. Particularly, in the case of drivers, the agency should know employed drivers who are cozy in the area of the accident prevention system, procedures and policies, which were not observed by the driver in head teacher (Byman 5-7). Other areas that drivers should be knowledgeable in, include federal, local and state regulation on safety, these including the OSHA, state safety belts. This is especially an important area, as the driver from the case only required that the passengers sit down, but did not give any regard to the use of safety belts which may have avoided the injuries noted. The company should also have blocked the driver for knowledge on safe limitation and operation of brakes and transit emergency brake procedures. Of particular significance to the case is the questionable experience of the driver, who should be knowle dgeable in avoiding sudden halt which were the direct cause of the injuries, on-board altercations and the action to be taken, and passenger evacuation where there is need for that. These areas will snap the grounds for action in law to the passengers of the company in question, which may be sued for the injuries sustained by the passengers (Byman 8-15). This case is comparable to that of Donoghue v Stevenson1932UKHL 100, where Mrs. Donoghue drank a bottle of ginger beer, which contained a snail. After the incident, she fell ill, which make her sue the ginger beer manufacturer. During the hearing, the house decided that the manufacturer had failed to exercise their transaction of care to her as a customer of their beer. Therefore, it was noted that there was the breach of that duty of care, as the manufacturers failure to check the safety of the product had caused her harm. In the same line, the case of Lancung transit shows a case of breach of the duty of care, as the company , according to its accident prevention program should have ensured that the safety of all the passengers was maintained at maximum. An example of the duties of care breached include requiring the