A Review of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, by John Perkins Essay Example for Free

A Review of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, by tail Perkins EssayConfessions of an Economic Hit Man, by John Perkins, is supposed to be a book about the authors real life activities as a covert agent of the United States. contrasted other agents, Perkins alleges that he and others, operated to undermine the frugal stability of other nations. While this book uses a recite of references, few of these books seems to have any economic relevance at all. One book, The Blood Bankers Tales from the Global ohmic resistance Economy, by James S. Henry, does make similar claims to those of Perkins however, unlike Perkins, Henry investigates worldwide economic crimes that are two overt and subversive in nature.Perkins states that he was recruited to encounter as a covert agent of the organisation shortly after graduating from college. In his role as an economic hit man, Perkins was expected to meet with leading of various countries, to convince them to make large investments an d to accept loans for which they tooshie ill afford to make the payments. These machinations resulted in these countries being in debt to larger powers, including the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, often in more than ways than one.After a time, Perkins claims, he grew uncomfortable with his role and left his position as an economic hit man. Perkins claims that now that he is no longer a part of this corrupt operation, he feels compelled to show his story. Perkins claims that he has good reason to write this book. By telling his story, he claims that not only merchant ship he make people aware of what is happening all over the world, but that he can also create solutions to the worlds economic problems. If this book has any one flaw, however, it is in Perkins credibility. scorn his claims that he was responsible for economic subterfuge, Perkins never backs his claims with undeniable facts, statistics, or figures. Neither does he connect his work with any other te xts or documents that have a firm factual grounding. His bibliography is not scholarly in nature rather, virtually all of his sources are secondary. The points that Perkins makes may have some validity. While this book was arouse to read, however, a critically thinking reader would have to question his role in the events that he claims occurred.